Mixed Methods Research Design in the Social Sciences: Benefits, Challenges and Mitigation Strategies

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to examine the application of mixed-methods research in the social sciences, specifically emphasizing the main benefits and challenges of integrating quantitative and qualitative research approaches and proposing practical solutions to these challenges. Methods: The study followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines to perform a systematic literature review. Using Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, ResearchGate and Google Scholar, peer-reviewed journal articles were carefully identified. To refine the search process, keywords and Boolean Operators were employed. Articles were selected through established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Out of 100 articles identified, 16 met the criteria. The selected studies were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings: The results indicated a broader understanding of research problems, data triangulation, validity and reliability of the research findings, and a more holistic perspective as the most commonly reported benefits of integrating qualitative and quantitative research. Conversely, the most reported challenges were the high resource requirements, limitations in researcher skills and expertise, and the complexity of mixed-methods research design. To address these challenges, the literature emphasised adherence to established methodological guidelines, adequate training, sufficient allocation of resources, and collaboration within multidisciplinary research teams. Originality: The study provides a systematic synthesis of empirical evidence on the benefits, challenges, and mitigation strategies for addressing challenges. Practical Implications: The findings highlight valuable considerations for researchers, institutions, and policymakers. Indeed, proper design and execution of mixed-methods research contribute to trusted and quality research, and evidence-based decision making.