Home/Akroterion/Article Record
Peer-Reviewed Article March 29, 2014

TACITUS' ACCOUNT OF THE PANNONIAN REVOLT (ANN. 1.16-30)

Are you an author of this work?Link to your sovereign AfriScholar profile
Published in: Akroterion
Publisher: Stellenbsoch University, Department of Ancient Studies • South Africa • 0303-1896 • 2079-2883
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7445/41-3-4-203

Abstract

Introduction The Pannonian revolt (Ann. 1.16-30) is one of the sections that receives the least attention in the prolific body of criticism on the first six books of the Annales. This results partly from the bipartite structure of the Tiberian hexad which invites critics-once they have dealt with the prologue (1.1-15)I_to concentrate on Germanicus as the foil for Tiberius in the first triad (1.3lff) and on Seianus in the second. However, the main reason for the lack of interest is probably that, in spite of Leeman's excellent discussion (1974:368-377) of capita 16 to 30, the view expressed in F.R.D. Goodyear's commentary (1972:195) still looms large in critical perceptions of Tacitus' description of the revolt in Pannonia:

Download Full Text PDFView at PublisherCrossref RecordCrossref XML

Verified Citation Velocity

Recorded scholarly citations in African and international peer-reviewed literature

24
Total Citations

Citations are continuously tracked and harvested across continental OJS endpoints and OpenAlex feeds.