Home/SVU-International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Applications/Article Record
Peer-Reviewed Article May 7, 2024

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Techniques for Fault Detection in Solar Panel Systems

Are you an author of this work?Link to your sovereign AfriScholar profile
Published in: SVU-International Journal of Engineering Sciences and Applications
Publisher: South Valley University, Faculty of Engineering • Egypt • 2785-9967 • 2735-4571
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/svusrc.2024.279389.1198

Abstract

The utilization of Machine Learning (ML) classifiers offers a viable approach to improving diagnostic accuracy and system dependability in the pursuit of optimizing problem detection in solar panel systems. This work aims to conduct a thorough assessment of different Machine Learning (ML) classifiers in order to determine the most efficient models for detecting faults in solar panel systems. We rigorously tested and analyzed the classifiers AdaBoost, GaussianNB, Logistic Regression, Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), Decision Tree (DT), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Extra Trees (ET). We evaluated the classifiers using their F1 scores, a crucial metric for measuring model performance in imbalanced class scenarios commonly encountered in fault detection tasks. The results show that the Decision Tree (DT), KNN, Random Forest (RF), and Extra Trees (ET) classifiers worked better than expected. All of them got perfect F1 scores of 1.000, which shows how well they can find bugs. On the other hand, AdaBoost demonstrated a lower F1 score of 0.591, suggesting possible constraints in its use for detecting faults in solar panel systems. This study advances fault detection in solar panels, enhancing system reliability and reducing maintenance costs. It also guides the development of sophisticated diagnostic tools, boosting solar technology adoption.

Download Full Text PDFView at PublisherCrossref RecordCrossref XML

Verified Citation Velocity

Recorded scholarly citations in African and international peer-reviewed literature

18
Total Citations

Citations are continuously tracked and harvested across continental OJS endpoints and OpenAlex feeds.