Home/Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (JGEB)/Article Record
Peer-Reviewed Article July 6, 2020

The present and potential future methods for delivering CRISPR/Cas9 components in plants

Are you an author of this work?Link to your sovereign AfriScholar profile
Published in: Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (JGEB)
Publisher: Elsevier BV • Egypt • 1687-157X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-020-00036-8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology is a DNA manipulation tool for trait improvement. This technology has been demonstrated and successfully applied to edit the genome in various species of plants. The delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components within rigid plant cells is very crucial for high editing efficiency. Here, we insight the strengths and weaknesses of each method of delivery. MAIN TEXT: The mutation efficiency of genome editing may vary and affected by different factors. Out of various factors, the delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 components into cells and genome is vital. The way of delivery defines whether the edited plant is transgenic or transgene-free. In many countries, the transgenic approach of improvement is a significant limitation in the regulatory approval of genetically modified crops. Gene editing provides an opportunity for generating transgene-free edited genome of the plant. Nevertheless, the mode of delivery of the CRISPR/Cas9 component is of crucial importance for genome modification in plants. Different delivery methods such as Agrobacterium-mediated, bombardment or biolistic method, floral-dip, and PEG-mediated protoplast are frequently applied to crops for efficient genome editing. CONCLUSION: We have reviewed different delivery methods with prons and cons for genome editing in plants. A novel nanoparticle and pollen magnetofection-mediated delivery systems which would be very useful in the near future. Further, the factors affecting editing efficiency, such as the promoter, transformation method, and selection pressure, are discussed in the present review.

Download Full Text PDFView at PublisherCrossref RecordCrossref XML

Verified Citation Velocity

Recorded scholarly citations in African and international peer-reviewed literature

151
Total Citations

Citations are continuously tracked and harvested across continental OJS endpoints and OpenAlex feeds.