Home/UCC Law Journal/Article Record
Peer-Reviewed Article November 30, 2021

Vaccine hesitancy, mandatory covid-19 vaccination and the right to personal autonomy in Nigeria: A constitutional analysis

Are you an author of this work?Link to your sovereign AfriScholar profile
Published in: UCC Law Journal
Publisher: University of Cape Coast • Ghana • 2756-701X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.47963/ucclj.v1i2.419

Abstract

Since countries began vaccine rollout against the COVID-19 virus, all hands have been on deck to vaccinate as many people as possible, in order to achieve a high vaccine uptake towards herd immunity. Though slow, Nigeria just like other countries, has been vaccinating its citizens. However, the vaccination effort, like similar programmes has continued to encounter the familiar foe of vaccine hesitancy. Where vaccine hesitancy becomes an issue, a likely response is for the government to explore the option of mandatory vaccination, either directly or indirectly, with the goal of compelling citizens to be vaccinated, or suffer some jeopardy. Such a move is bound to touch on core human rights, especially the right to personal autonomy. This article examines the extent to which a mandatory COVID-19 vaccination programme in Nigeria, conflicts with the citizen’s right to determine what should be done to his/her body. It concludes that rather than forcing vaccines on people, a better option is for government to gain the trust of the people, through multi-layered social engagements.

Download Full Text PDFView at PublisherCrossref RecordCrossref XML

Verified Citation Velocity

Recorded scholarly citations in African and international peer-reviewed literature

4
Total Citations

Citations are continuously tracked and harvested across continental OJS endpoints and OpenAlex feeds.