Digital surveillance and big data: Balancing the rights to privacy and security in Kenya
Abstract
Education, personal identity and democracy fl ourish in private.Generalised surveillance of disenchanted groups stifl es them.Although the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights is silent on the right to privacy, Kenya's Constitution expressly protects against surveillance abuse.Informed consent is required from data subjects prior to collecting or sharing their personal information.Yet, Kenyan courts have upheld laws and policies introducing generalised surveillance.Th e conundrum confronting Kenya's judiciary regarding surveillance of mobile telephone data is: If counter-terrorism relies on mass surveillance, such policies necessarily violate privacy rights, in the guise of enhancing security.Nonetheless, enhancing the state's surveillance capacity to intercept digital communications was accepted by the Court as a justifi able violation of privacy rights.Conversely, in Communication Authority of Kenya v Okiya Omtatah Okoiti, the Court of Appeal observed that globally, the theft of mobile phones and proliferating counterfeit devices have become major regulatory concerns.Problematically, it
